Comments on: Refactoring FitNesse Tests

By: johanneslink

johanneslink — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:53:02 +0000

I’ve done some testing with the documentation that comes with FitNesse. It didn’t crash and it finished its tasks. And that was a couple of groovy versions earlier – groovy is supposed to be an order of magnitude faster now.
Give it a try and let me know both ways. I might be willing to invest in ReFit if you cannot use it due to performance reasons.

By: Ray

Ray — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:16:08 +0000

Quite happy to find this.

My team have been using fitnesse for a couple of years now and our suite is enormous. I am very much more concerned with performance. Fitnesse takes so long to search through our suite for references(during a rename or move) that it eventually crashes.

Is ReFit capable of better?

By: martin

martin — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:30:53 +0000

Hi,

sounds interessting. We, at the FH Nordwestschweiz are currently working on extending the FitPro Plugin for Fit test refactoring, in the sense, that when the application code is changed, the appropriate fit tables will be adapted, to. We will present it on the OOPSLA this year: “Reverse Generation and Refactoring of Fit Acceptance Tests for Legacy Code”

By: strug

strug — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:31:27 +0000

cool stuff. looks promising. did you contract the fitnesse guys? maybe they find it interesting too and it could be bundled/integrated with fitnesse or slim.